On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote: > В сообщении от Понедельник 12 июля 2010 22:34:48 автор Khem Raj написал: >> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Where each applet is installed as a tiny binary linked against shared >> > libbusybox. >> >> may be it should be a DISTRO_FEATURE in OE > > Well, I don't think so. First, it doesn't change anything functional, only the > way busybox is linked/installed/packaged and second is that it only affects > one package, so if distro wants that, I think it should maintain its own > defconfig (at least four distros do that already
ok in that case, it seems ok. This makes it a distro feature. and IMO busybox is the > package you want to tune for your specific needs). Or the distro itself may > choose not to use busybox at all so such FEATURE would make no sense in that > case. > > I view FEATUREs as a way to make distro-global configuration, ipv6 is probably > one of the best examples as it potentially affects many packages. > FEATURE_INDIVIDUAL is completely busybox-specific. if a distro does not support shared libraries then this feature is a problem. but then if we tune it in busybox config then even that can be taken care of so seems fine. > > -- > http://roman.khimov.ru > mailto: [email protected] > gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3 > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
