On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:10 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: > > And cacao: > > > > | configure: error: armv7a systems are not supported at this time > > | ERROR: Function do_configure failed > > > >> yes I was expecting that kind of problems. openssl also has similar issues. > > > >> another idea that struck me was that we could change the target triplet to > >> drop > >> TARGET_VENDOR and replace it with TARGET_SUB_ARCH and TARGET_SUBARCH > >> could be anything > >> we could even make it same as MACHINE_ARCH which means you will build > >> toolchain per machine > >> and they will live together. > > > >> then the tool names will be something like arm-v7-linux-gnueabi-* > >> powerpc-e500-linux-gnu > >> mips-mips2-linux etc. instead of *-angstrom-*- or *-oe-*- > > > >> or arm-beagleboad-linux-gnueabi-* etc if we go with MACHINE_ARCH > > > >> that would keep all recipe configury happy as the arch detected from > >> config.guess will be what > >> we had (arm, mips, mipsel powerpc etc) so no changes needed but we > >> will have to drop the brand > > > >> does it sound good ? bad? > > I don't think abusing target vendor for that is a good idea. And I'm > quite attached to my angstrom branded toolchains, tbh.
Note that you can still append your angstrom string to the vendor part of the triplet... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
