On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 17:10 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> > And cacao: >> > >> > | configure: error: armv7a systems are not supported at this time >> > | ERROR: Function do_configure failed >> > >> >> yes I was expecting that kind of problems. openssl also has similar >> >> issues. >> > >> >> another idea that struck me was that we could change the target triplet >> >> to drop >> >> TARGET_VENDOR and replace it with TARGET_SUB_ARCH and TARGET_SUBARCH >> >> could be anything >> >> we could even make it same as MACHINE_ARCH which means you will build >> >> toolchain per machine >> >> and they will live together. >> > >> >> then the tool names will be something like arm-v7-linux-gnueabi-* >> >> powerpc-e500-linux-gnu >> >> mips-mips2-linux etc. instead of *-angstrom-*- or *-oe-*- >> > >> >> or arm-beagleboad-linux-gnueabi-* etc if we go with MACHINE_ARCH >> > >> >> that would keep all recipe configury happy as the arch detected from >> >> config.guess will be what >> >> we had (arm, mips, mipsel powerpc etc) so no changes needed but we >> >> will have to drop the brand >> > >> >> does it sound good ? bad? >> >> I don't think abusing target vendor for that is a good idea. And I'm >> quite attached to my angstrom branded toolchains, tbh. > > Note that you can still append your angstrom string to the vendor part > of the triplet...
arm-v7_angstrom-linux-gnueabi- etc. is a possibility > > Cheers, > > Richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
