On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Vitus Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
2010/8/13 Vitus Jensen <[email protected]>:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Vitus Jensen wrote:
The following patches will update canutils to the current version
4.0.6 and remove older 4.0.x versions. Also only the latest
version of libsocketcan will be kept.
Frans, thank you for the ACKs. Could you please apply the patches,
too? I have no right to do so.
Applied. Thanks for the contribution
System guru's: Vitus's patches did not show up in patchwork
They did. But after you posted you ACKs I changed their state to "Accepted"
and then they are usually filtered by "Action Required". I'm not really
sure I did the right thing but I don't believe they shouldn't remain in
"New".
If they got applied change the state to 'applied'
Sure, already did! Do I set the 'archive' bit, too?
Frans got hit by the fact, that 'accepted' patches don't show up in the
list by default.
Vitus posts patches
Frans acks patches
Vitus changes state to 'accepted'
Vitus asks Frans to apply
Frans: where are those patches in patchwork???
Frans forces his googlemail to produce usable mail and applies
Vitus changes state to 'applied'
Probably I should update the wiki to document the above procedure, right?
Vitus
--
Vitus Jensen, Hannover, Germany, Universe (current)
pgp public key available from keyservers
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
