2010/8/13 Vitus Jensen <[email protected]>: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Vitus Jensen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >>>> >>>> 2010/8/13 Vitus Jensen <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Vitus Jensen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The following patches will update canutils to the current version >>>>>> 4.0.6 and remove older 4.0.x versions. Also only the latest >>>>>> version of libsocketcan will be kept. >>>>> >>>>> Frans, thank you for the ACKs. Could you please apply the patches, >>>>> too? I have no right to do so. >>>> >>>> Applied. Thanks for the contribution >>>> >>>> System guru's: Vitus's patches did not show up in patchwork >>> >>> They did. But after you posted you ACKs I changed their state to >>> "Accepted" >>> and then they are usually filtered by "Action Required". I'm not really >>> sure I did the right thing but I don't believe they shouldn't remain in >>> "New". >> >> If they got applied change the state to 'applied' > > Sure, already did! Do I set the 'archive' bit, too? > > > Frans got hit by the fact, that 'accepted' patches don't show up in the list > by default. > > Vitus posts patches > Frans acks patches > Vitus changes state to 'accepted' > Vitus asks Frans to apply > Frans: where are those patches in patchwork??? > Frans forces his googlemail to produce usable mail and applies > Vitus changes state to 'applied' > > Probably I should update the wiki to document the above procedure, right? >
I saw a different thread from Paul on patchwork. Let's discuss this in that thread. Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
