On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote: > В сообщении от Понедельник 16 августа 2010 22:59:53 автор Frans Meulenbroeks > написал: >> One small question: Do we want to keep this recipe at >> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" ?? > > Well, we're using 1.0.0 since the day it's been released, and it's a perfect > fit for us, but I know that it _might_ break some things, just google for > openssl 1.0.0 breakage/compatibility patches/etc, that's why I've pushed it > that way so that distro maintainers could test whether it works for them with > their particular package sets and act accordingly. > > I certainly have nothing against removing that line if everyone is OK with > that. >
IMO the newest version in a recipe should always be default preference this way we can stabilize recipe upgrades quicker. This also means a wider testing before pushing a new recipe DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" makes it to escape the testing. > -- > http://roman.khimov.ru > mailto: [email protected] > gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3 > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
