2010/8/16 Khem Raj <[email protected]>: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Roman I Khimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> В сообщении от Понедельник 16 августа 2010 22:59:53 автор Frans Meulenbroeks >> написал: >>> One small question: Do we want to keep this recipe at >>> DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" ?? >> >> Well, we're using 1.0.0 since the day it's been released, and it's a perfect >> fit for us, but I know that it _might_ break some things, just google for >> openssl 1.0.0 breakage/compatibility patches/etc, that's why I've pushed it >> that way so that distro maintainers could test whether it works for them with >> their particular package sets and act accordingly. >> >> I certainly have nothing against removing that line if everyone is OK with >> that. >> > > IMO the newest version in a recipe should always be default preference > this way we can > stabilize recipe upgrades quicker. This also means a wider testing > before pushing a new recipe > DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" makes it to escape the testing. > For the record. We have 451 recipes with a DEFAULT_PREFERENCE clause. 425 of these seem to have a negative value in it. In total there are 712 lines with DEFAULT_PREFERENCE (especailly kernel recipes have preferences for specific machines and have multiple DEFAULT_PREFERENCE lines)
Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
