On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> wrote: > 2010/8/17 Jason Kridner <[email protected]>: >> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> 2010/8/17 Jason Kridner <[email protected]>: >>>> I want to use the name beagleboard-demo-image for what actually ships >>>> with the xM boards. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb | 30 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb >>>> >>>> diff --git a/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb >>>> b/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..d83281c >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ >>>> +# Demo image for beagleboard >>>> + >>>> +IMAGE_LINGUAS = "de-de fr-fr en-gb en-us pt-br es-es kn-in ml-in ta-in" >>>> + >>>> +XSERVER ?= "xserver-xorg \ >>>> + xf86-input-evdev \ >>>> + xf86-input-mouse \ >>>> + xf86-video-fbdev \ >>>> + xf86-input-keyboard \ >>>> +" >>>> + >>>> +ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL ?= "" >>>> +SPLASH = "exquisite exquisite-themes exquisite-theme-angstrom" >>>> + >>>> +export IMAGE_BASENAME = "Beagleboard-demo-image" >>>> + >>>> +DEPENDS = "task-base" >>>> +IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ >>>> + ${XSERVER} \ >>>> + ${ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL} \ >>>> + task-beagleboard-demo \ >>>> + ${SPLASH} \ >>>> + " >>>> + >>>> +IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND = "create_etc_timestamp" >>>> + >>>> +#zap root password for release images >>>> +ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += 'install_linguas; >>>> $...@base_conditional("DISTRO_TYPE", "release", "zap_root_password; ", >>>> "",d)}' >>>> + >>>> +inherit image >>>> -- >>> >>> What about a better name? E.g. XM-demo-iimage? >> >> I don't know why we need two demo images. This should run on Rev Cx as well. > > Actually XM-demo-image was just a proposal > For me beagleboard-olddemo-image indicates that it is not really an up > to date version. > I think I would prefer a name that better indicates the purpose. Maybe > add stable in the name? > Another option would be to have the image delivered with the XM as > e.g. beagleboard-demo-image_1.0 and the newer versions e.g. 1.1 etc > (or 2.0 or whatever)
Koen wanted to keep the old one around--I'm not sure for what purpose. >> >>> >>> And to widen the question: do we want to maintain customer/supplier >>> specific images in the oe repo? >>> The company I work for also has some images, but for now we opted to >>> keep them in a private overlay. >> >> I want this to be public and part of the mainline to make it easy for >> people to reproduce. It is for a relatively broad target. Is there a >> reason it shouldn't be there? >> > > Ok, I understand that (and I have not really a problem with that). It > is just the name that didn't make me too happy. > > Frans > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
