Am Dienstag, den 17.08.2010, 23:01 +0200 schrieb Frans Meulenbroeks: > 2010/8/17 Jason Kridner <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2010/8/17 Jason Kridner <[email protected]>: > >>> I want to use the name beagleboard-demo-image for what actually ships > >>> with the xM boards. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Kridner <[email protected]> > >>> --- > >>> recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb | 30 > >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >>> create mode 100644 recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb > >>> > >>> diff --git a/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb > >>> b/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 0000000..d83281c > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/recipes/images/beagleboard-olddemo-image.bb > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > >>> +# Demo image for beagleboard > >>> + > >>> +IMAGE_LINGUAS = "de-de fr-fr en-gb en-us pt-br es-es kn-in ml-in ta-in" > >>> + > >>> +XSERVER ?= "xserver-xorg \ > >>> + xf86-input-evdev \ > >>> + xf86-input-mouse \ > >>> + xf86-video-fbdev \ > >>> + xf86-input-keyboard \ > >>> +" > >>> + > >>> +ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL ?= "" > >>> +SPLASH = "exquisite exquisite-themes exquisite-theme-angstrom" > >>> + > >>> +export IMAGE_BASENAME = "Beagleboard-demo-image" > >>> + > >>> +DEPENDS = "task-base" > >>> +IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > >>> + ${XSERVER} \ > >>> + ${ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL} \ > >>> + task-beagleboard-demo \ > >>> + ${SPLASH} \ > >>> + " > >>> + > >>> +IMAGE_PREPROCESS_COMMAND = "create_etc_timestamp" > >>> + > >>> +#zap root password for release images > >>> +ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND += 'install_linguas; > >>> $...@base_conditional("DISTRO_TYPE", "release", "zap_root_password; ", > >>> "",d)}' > >>> + > >>> +inherit image > >>> -- > >> > >> What about a better name? E.g. XM-demo-iimage? > > > > I don't know why we need two demo images. This should run on Rev Cx as > > well. > > Actually XM-demo-image was just a proposal > For me beagleboard-olddemo-image indicates that it is not really an up > to date version. > I think I would prefer a name that better indicates the purpose. Maybe > add stable in the name?
So why create an “old” image? What is the difference between these two images anyway? > Another option would be to have the image delivered with the XM as > e.g. beagleboard-demo-image_1.0 and the newer versions e.g. 1.1 etc > (or 2.0 or whatever) […] Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
