On 27 August 2010 13:15, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Graham Gower <[email protected]> wrote: >> """if a build fails, then issues are reported, and the testing-testing >> branch is moved ahead to capture fixes made in the dev branch. Once >> the issue is fixed, all combinations are retested.""" >> >> Can I suggest that the testing-testing branch not be moved ahead? > > > I think yes the fixes should be committed to master and then pulled > into the testing-testing branch > IOW testing-testing moved ahead to new head on each monday and I think > if you have successful build > on prior monday and dont want to test it the tag should still be > there. I think continuous build is the only > way we can make sure that what we are committing is not breaking > stuff. ideally testing branch should move > every time a fix is committed upstream which was reported in > testing-testing branch but Monday to Monday is > ok too.
I think maybe I was just confused about how it will work in practise. I'll just wait and watch it for a couple of weeks :) -Graham _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
