On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Chris Larson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I like the concept. It seems not unlike the 'master' vs 'next' or linux vs > linux-test, or indeed, as you imply, unstable vs testing in debian. I do > want to point out that you could, if you chose to, include the tested > baselines in the message attached to the tag (if annotated). The only > downside to that being you couldn't add to it after the fact the way you > could with a wiki. At a minimum, I'd link to the wiki page for that tag > from a tag message. Thanks for the ideas -- I have updated the process some, and I think we could apply the tag on the following Monday after the testing is complete -- this would allow us to add the annotations. I'm also thinking on the next cycle to use the name testing-next (instead of testing-testing) for branch we create every week for testing. Thanks, Cliff -- ================= http://bec-systems.com _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
