В сообщении от Пятница 27 августа 2010 16:15:01 автор Frans Meulenbroeks написал: > 1. If a patch does not get any review feedback in X weeks time; it is > ok to apply it. People who need more time to review a patch can > mention that in a short reply. In that case they are granted Y more > weeks to review. > (suggestion: X = Y = 2) > 2. If someone NAKs a patch it is obligatory to provide an explanation > why the patch is not good. > Rationale is that > a) people can fix the problem seen by the reviewer > b) people learn from it > c) if there is a disagreement it can be discussed (and if needed > raised to the TSC) > 3) NAKs that are not motivated/explained can be ignored as not given.
Looks good to me, especially the first one as some defined period of time to wait is useful. Two weeks is OK. -- http://roman.khimov.ru mailto: [email protected] gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 0xE5E055C3
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
