-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 27-08-10 14:15, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: > It is a good rule that important changes (toolchain, infrastructure) > are reviewed before being committed. > This is e.g. also specified in > http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_Policy > > However, recently I've seen some issues that our review process does > not seem to work or is abused. > > I see two things happening. > - patches are submitted for review but do not gain any feedback in a > reasonable time. I have several patches in the queue that did not get > any feedback. > - people are abusing their powers by rejecting changes without > motivation. See e.g [1] and [2]. I feel if you reject a patch you have > an obligation to explain why you rejected it.
If you want to delete a recipe I maintain, the burden is on you or are you saying that maintainers aren't in charge of their recipes anymore? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFMeOQmMkyGM64RGpERAu7PAKCgv9CNgRClgz28jyNeHqANqgBsdwCgr4Lp g5tptYYjCTFtUZnOukdJ3Kg= =wUcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
