2010/9/2 Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]>: > see > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-September/023680.html > > Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]> > --- > classes/base.bbclass | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/classes/base.bbclass b/classes/base.bbclass > index 299e875..2c9ad89 100644 > --- a/classes/base.bbclass > +++ b/classes/base.bbclass > @@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ python () { > this_machine = bb.data.getVar('MACHINE', d, 1) > if this_machine and not re.match(need_machine, this_machine): > this_soc_family = bb.data.getVar('SOC_FAMILY', d, 1) > - if this_soc_family and not re.match(need_machine, > this_soc_family): > + if (this_soc_family and not re.match(need_machine, > this_soc_family)) or not this_soc_family: > raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with machine %s" > % this_machine) > > need_target = bb.data.getVar('COMPATIBLE_TARGET_SYS', d, 1) > -- > 1.6.4.2 >
Bump. This is out for a week now without any feedback, although the patch is quite trivial. Actually I am quite disappointed by the developers who created and pushed the SOC_FAMILY patch. They were very eager to push this change in a day, without waiting for the discussion on it to conclude, but they seem to be not-so-willing to review a fix for a problem they caused (let alone resolve the problem). What is even somewhat irritating is that one of the people involved is often in the front seat when it comes to criticizing others if they make a mistake. Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
