Hello, On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 09:11 +0200, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2010/9/2 Frans Meulenbroeks <[email protected]>: >> > - if this_soc_family and not re.match(need_machine, >> > this_soc_family): >> > + if (this_soc_family and not re.match(need_machine, >> > this_soc_family)) or not this_soc_family: >> > raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("incompatible with machine >> > %s" % this_machine) > > I am still far from convinced that this hunk of SOC_FAMILY code is > desirable to have in the first place but, if it's going to stay there, > clearly it should be fixed so that it doesn't cause problems for > non-users. > Same feeling here.
I don't think we should clutter OpenEmbedded with fixes for one rare case and leave it unattended / non-understood / unmaintained for all other cases. Hands up for those who can maintain SOC_FAMILY support. :-) Regards, -- Leon _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
