On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 05:40:59PM +0800, Anuj Mittal wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 5:46 PM Jose Quaresma via
> lists.openembedded.org
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > From: Shoudi Li <[email protected]>
> >
> > For the boards with multiple UDC ports, adb funtion will be impacted due
> > to below error.
> >
> > ls /sys/class/udc/ > /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/adb/UDC
> > ls: write error: Device or resource busy
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shoudi Li <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> >
> > b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> > index ca6c3df275..76b5e29624 100644
> > ---
> > a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> > +++
> > b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
>
> For some reason, there are two *android-tools-conf-configfs* recipes
> which seem identical except for this and a few other minor changes. I
> think this one in dynamic-layers/selinux should be removed instead of
> aligning it with the other recipe.
Looks like it. Commit d3f4e6851243 ("android-tools 10: import version
from meta-clang"), which added the second copy, isn't clear, why the
second copy was necessary.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#123824):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/123824
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117415388/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
