Hi Dmitry,
the reason I added a second version of android-tools is explained in the
pull-request which added android-tools version 10:
https://github.com/openembedded/meta-openembedded/pull/664#issuecomment-1468861667
(one version depends on meta-selinux and the other does not).

However I was not the one adding a second version of android-tools-conf. I
don't see a good reason to have two copies of the recipe
android-tools-conf, since this recipe doesn't depend on meta-selinux. This
was probably just a mistake.

On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 9:08 PM Dmitry Baryshkov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 05:40:59PM +0800, Anuj Mittal wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2026 at 5:46 PM Jose Quaresma via
> > lists.openembedded.org
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Shoudi Li <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > For the boards with multiple UDC ports, adb funtion will be impacted
> due
> > > to below error.
> > >
> > > ls /sys/class/udc/ > /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/adb/UDC
> > > ls: write error: Device or resource busy
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shoudi Li <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  .../android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start        | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> > > index ca6c3df275..76b5e29624 100644
> > > ---
> a/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> > > +++
> b/meta-oe/dynamic-layers/selinux/recipes-devtool/android-tools/android-tools-conf-configfs/android-gadget-start
> >
> > For some reason, there are two *android-tools-conf-configfs* recipes
> > which seem identical except for this and a few other minor changes. I
> > think this one in dynamic-layers/selinux should be removed instead of
> > aligning it with the other recipe.
>
> Looks like it. Commit d3f4e6851243 ("android-tools 10: import version
> from meta-clang"), which added the second copy, isn't clear, why the
> second copy was necessary.
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#123825): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/123825
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117415388/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to