Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 07:31 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Paul Menzel > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Could you please add more information to the patch headers [1]. Like, > > were do they come from, links to more information why they are needed > > and possibly upstream tickets or commits. > > its already there in the patch headers.
Just for `sh4_set_fpscr.patch` and not for the other two
sh4_set_fpscr_2.12.patch
sh4_local-fpscr_values.patch
as far as I can see.
And looking at [1] from `sh4_set_fpscr.patch` this patch looks like a
subset than the one in the Debian BTS [2]. So if this has been applied
upstream yet I would prefer a link to the commit.
I am sorry to bother you with this. But this is my perspective, a guy
who is not involved with this library a lot. But when I am facing a
problem with the library and try to get an overview it will take me more
time than needed to get around everything because the documentation is
lacking. So please tell me what I am missing. ;-)
(The commit summary could also be improved to »apply fpscr patches« or
something similar.)
Thanks,
Paul
[1] http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2009-12/msg00009.html
[2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565369
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
