Hi, Paul. 2010/9/17 Paul Menzel <[email protected]>: > Am Donnerstag, den 16.09.2010, 07:31 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj: >> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Paul Menzel >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Could you please add more information to the patch headers [1]. Like, >> > were do they come from, links to more information why they are needed >> > and possibly upstream tickets or commits. >> >> its already there in the patch headers. > > Just for `sh4_set_fpscr.patch` and not for the other two > > sh4_set_fpscr_2.12.patch > sh4_local-fpscr_values.patch > > as far as I can see. > > And looking at [1] from `sh4_set_fpscr.patch` this patch looks like a > subset than the one in the Debian BTS [2]. So if this has been applied > upstream yet I would prefer a link to the commit.
The part of sh4_set_fpscr.patch is already taken in by upstream. And I sent the other parts. And I am going to have I cooperate with codesourcery and adopt sh4_local-fpscr_values.patch. > > I am sorry to bother you with this. But this is my perspective, a guy > who is not involved with this library a lot. But when I am facing a > problem with the library and try to get an overview it will take me more > time than needed to get around everything because the documentation is > lacking. So please tell me what I am missing. ;-) > Yes，you are right. I lacked sensitivity. Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
