* Khem Raj <[email protected]> [21.09.2010 07:43]: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Frederik Sdun > <[email protected]> wrote: > > * Paul Menzel <[email protected]> [21.09.2010 00:18]: > > Hi, > > > > fso is quit untested with none GNU libcs and we partly depend on it. I > > wrote a short patch which add a --enable-no-gnuism switch for configure, > > but want to talk to Michael, before commiting it. Could you test it and > > report more gnuism in our code? And is possible to get a backtrace with > > uClibc which is not gnuism, but available in all none-GNU > > implementations? > > instead you could use the defines like __UCLIBC__ which are there when > using uclibc. > This is only available when compiling the C code. In the stage of compiling vala code it's not available. -- IRC: playya @ Freenode, Gimpnet xmpp: [email protected] identi.ca: playya
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
