On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Frederik Sdun <[email protected]> wrote: > * Khem Raj <[email protected]> [21.09.2010 07:43]: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Frederik Sdun >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > * Paul Menzel <[email protected]> [21.09.2010 00:18]: >> > Hi, >> > >> > fso is quit untested with none GNU libcs and we partly depend on it. I >> > wrote a short patch which add a --enable-no-gnuism switch for configure, >> > but want to talk to Michael, before commiting it. Could you test it and >> > report more gnuism in our code? And is possible to get a backtrace with >> > uClibc which is not gnuism, but available in all none-GNU >> > implementations? >> >> instead you could use the defines like __UCLIBC__ which are there when >> using uclibc. >> > This is only available when compiling the C code. In the stage of > compiling vala code it's not available.
I see, adding builtin defines to vala compiler can also help. > -- > IRC: playya @ Freenode, Gimpnet > xmpp: [email protected] > identi.ca: playya > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkyYYCwACgkQvbwBzXsbjyqPvACfaz9IB5VoEOryse0Ny1azfqC3 > ahEAn1UvFeSUj+s9KXdG7opBUqeiNyGv > =fQ+e > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > -- -Khem _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
