> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Frans Meulenbroeks > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:24 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] am-benchmarks: update to latest version > > 2010/9/29 Chase Maupin <[email protected]>: > > * Updated the SRCREV to the latest version of this project > > which includes support for multiple platforms. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <[email protected]> > > --- > > recipes/ti/am-benchmarks_svn.bb | 12 +++++++++--- > > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Don't have the full recipe handy, but is this latter UNDEFINED needed? > I would expect a COMPATIBLE_MACHINE somewhere causing the latter never > to happen. > Then again it might be a good safeguard.
Frans, Good point. In the past there was no difference between arm9 and cortex-a8 so we didn't really concern ourselves with COMPATIBLE_MACHINE because the code was supposed to be buildable for all of the different machines. Now we have these different directories containing sources for the different architectures. We could use compatible machine so I could go either way on this. Let me know if you want me to change this. > > Frans. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Openembedded-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
