2010/9/29 Maupin, Chase <[email protected]>: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Frans Meulenbroeks >> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:24 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [oe] [PATCH] am-benchmarks: update to latest version >> >> 2010/9/29 Chase Maupin <[email protected]>: >> > * Updated the SRCREV to the latest version of this project >> > which includes support for multiple platforms. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chase Maupin <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > recipes/ti/am-benchmarks_svn.bb | 12 +++++++++--- >> > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> >> Don't have the full recipe handy, but is this latter UNDEFINED needed? >> I would expect a COMPATIBLE_MACHINE somewhere causing the latter never >> to happen. >> Then again it might be a good safeguard. > > Frans, > > Good point. In the past there was no difference between arm9 and cortex-a8 > so we didn't really concern ourselves with COMPATIBLE_MACHINE because the > code was supposed to be buildable for all of the different machines. Now we > have these different directories containing sources for the different > architectures. We could use compatible machine so I could go either way on > this. Let me know if you want me to change this.
I prefer to use e.g. COMPATIBLE_MACHINE. That inhibits building a recipe for a machine for which it is not intended. Frans. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
