2010/9/30 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> As it stands we have 6 monotone recipes: >> >> monotone-5_0.25.2.bb >> monotone-6_0.27.bb >> monotone-6_0.31.bb >> monotone-6_0.33.bb >> monotone-6_0.34.bb >> monotone-6_0.37.bb >> >> There are all target-only recipes >> >> I can imagine it made sense to have a monotone recipe for the target >> when our sources were still in monotone, but I feel that nowadays it >> is less useful >> (apart from the question whether it is useful to have an SCM on an >> embedded system). >> >> Therefore I would like to bring up the following discussion topics: >> >> Is there any use to keep the old monotone-6 recipes? (all but 0.37). >> Or should we remove? >> >> And what about the monotone-5 recipe. Is that still useful? >> >> And what about the latest monotone-6 recipe? Is that still useful to keep? >> >> Your opinion is appreciated. > > As an aside, I can't find anything called monotone-5 or monotone-6, just > monotone. But I'd otherwise suggest the normal rules apply, delete the > unpinned versions assuming they're all GPLv2. > > -- > Tom Rini > Mentor Graphics Corporation
The dir is called monotone, both monotone-5 and monotone-6 are recipes within the monotone dir. (note the - between monotone and [56]) Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
