2010/9/30 Tom Rini <[email protected]>: > > As an aside, I can't find anything called monotone-5 or monotone-6, just > monotone. But I'd otherwise suggest the normal rules apply, delete the > unpinned versions assuming they're all GPLv2. >
removed all older monotione-6 versions BTW the license for all was MIT. I assume you wanted to say that if the latest was GPLv3 and an earlier one was still GPLv2 we should keep the v2 one too. off-topic: I know there are some places where this is the case (like samba), for those I would prefer if the last v2 recipe was named differently from the v3 ones. on-topic again: do we still want to keep the monotone-5 recipe? (personally I'd say no). And what about the latest monotone-6 recipe (although I do not really expect it to be used, I'm leaning towards keeping it, just in case people feel a sudden urge to restore an old OE montone db on their target) BTW: monotone itsels is already at 0.48 Frans _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
