On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:26:48PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > I agree. > > > Then if it is in the inc file, it needs to be taken out again when the > > next version comes. > > Sorry, I did not make myself clear. My point was if you could put > `configure.ac-nios2.patch` into `libX11/` or `files`.
better not to use files at all http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-October/025673.html diet-x11_1.1.5.bb libx11-trim_1.1.5.bb will find it ok in libx11* dir, because of FILESPATHPKG .= ":libx11-${PV}:libx11" in libx11.inc but even when it's the same file I would keep it in separate dirs, because newer versions won't need it (hopefully) and then it will be removed with older versions. > > Hence it was put in the individual files. > > > > BTW it looks like upstream might go for a slightly different patch. > > I'll leave it to Martin to decide whether to go for that one or for > > this one (he is on cc of the upstream correspondence). > > Again, could you provide a link to that discussion. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2010-November/051731.html Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
