Am Freitag, den 05.11.2010, 14:38 +0100 schrieb Martin Jansa: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 02:26:48PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > > I agree. > > > > > Then if it is in the inc file, it needs to be taken out again when the > > > next version comes. > > > > Sorry, I did not make myself clear. My point was if you could put > > `configure.ac-nios2.patch` into `libX11/` or `files`. > > better not to use files at all > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2010-October/025673.html
Correct. I forgot.
> diet-x11_1.1.5.bb libx11-trim_1.1.5.bb will find it ok in libx11* dir,
> because of FILESPATHPKG .= ":libx11-${PV}:libx11" in libx11.inc
>
> but even when it's the same file I would keep it in separate dirs,
> because newer versions won't need it (hopefully) and then it will be
> removed with older versions.
That is a valid argument. Although then patches should never be share
between versions unless there is no upstream development anymore?
It is fine either way by me. So do as you prefer.
> > > Hence it was put in the individual files.
> > >
> > > BTW it looks like upstream might go for a slightly different patch.
> > > I'll leave it to Martin to decide whether to go for that one or for
> > > this one (he is on cc of the upstream correspondence).
> >
> > Again, could you provide a link to that discussion.
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2010-November/051731.html
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
