Paul Menzel <[email protected]> [2010-11-06 00:21:08]:

> Indeed in all my tests there is no `luac` staged.
> This should be done by adding `lua5.1-native` to `DEPENDS` as you
> suggested. But I am wondering why `lua5.1` is not providing `luac`. Is
> there a problem with the `lua5.1` recipe [4][5]?

The question is, why there's no luac for you :-) It's working for me (tm), see 
bellow. 

yn...@ntbk:/media/data/devel/oe/ts72xx.git/tmp/work$ ls 
armv4t-angstrom-linux-*/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/*
armv4t-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/lua
armv4t-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/luac
armv4t-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/lua
armv4t-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/luac

-- ynezz

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to