Am Samstag, den 06.11.2010, 08:51 +0100 schrieb Petr Štetiar: > Paul Menzel <[email protected]> [2010-11-06 00:21:08]: > > > Indeed in all my tests there is no `luac` staged. > > This should be done by adding `lua5.1-native` to `DEPENDS` as you > > suggested. But I am wondering why `lua5.1` is not providing `luac`. Is > > there a problem with the `lua5.1` recipe [4][5]? > > The question is, why there's no luac for you :-) It's working for me (tm), > see bellow. > > yn...@ntbk:/media/data/devel/oe/ts72xx.git/tmp/work$ ls > armv4t-angstrom-linux-*/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/* > armv4t-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/lua > armv4t-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/luac > armv4t-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/lua > armv4t-angstrom-linux-uclibceabi/lua5.1-5.1.4-r9/packages-split/lua5.1/usr/bin/luac
I think my question is, why `luac` is not staged if `vlc` `DEPENDS` on `lua5.1`. Or is is inevitable to add `lua5.1-native` to `DEPENDS`? Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
