Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Eric Bénard: I would prefer if the error message `libtool: Command not found` (if it is that short) is noted in the commit summary.
gnome-power-manager: fix compilation: `libtool: Command not found`
> * libtool is hardcoded in src/Makefile and leads to
> libtool: Command not found
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <[email protected]>
> ---
> recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
> b/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
> index a752852..0c7bcb5 100644
> --- a/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
> +++ b/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_configure_append() {
> for i in $(find ${S} -name "Makefile") ; do
> sed -i -e s:-Werror::g $i
> done
> + sed -e "s/libtool --/${TARGET_SYS}-libtool --/" -i
> ${S}/src/Makefile
> }
>
> PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-applets"
Acked-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
What is the proper patch to send upstream? Is `${TARGET_SYS}` always
defined? But »-« would still make problems, wouldn’t it? Is there a
program implementing this correctly in `Makefile`?
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
