Hi Paul,
On 30/12/2010 11:20, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.12.2010, 09:55 +0100 schrieb Eric Bénard:
I would prefer if the error message `libtool: Command not found` (if it
is that short) is noted in the commit summary.
gnome-power-manager: fix compilation: `libtool: Command not found`
OK fixed and pushed.
* libtool is hardcoded in src/Makefile and leads to
libtool: Command not found
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<[email protected]>
---
recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
b/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
index a752852..0c7bcb5 100644
--- a/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
+++ b/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ do_configure_append() {
for i in $(find ${S} -name "Makefile") ; do
sed -i -e s:-Werror::g $i
done
+ sed -e "s/libtool --/${TARGET_SYS}-libtool --/" -i
${S}/src/Makefile
}
PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-applets"
Acked-by: Paul Menzel<[email protected]>
What is the proper patch to send upstream? Is `${TARGET_SYS}` always
defined? But »-« would still make problems, wouldn’t it? Is there a
program implementing this correctly in `Makefile`?
- TARGET_SYS is OE specific.
- The "--" is here to only replace the 2 or 3 instances of libtool concerned
by the workaround.
- I don't know what would be the proper patch to send upstream (and don't have
time to check for this now). I've just seen there are several new release of
gnome-power-manager so the problem may already be fixed, will see when I have
some time.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
