Eric Bénard <[email protected]> writes: >> Is there a reason we're perpetuating lzo1 for newer stuff rather than >> switching to lzo2? >> > lzo1 seems necessary : > compr_lzo.c:29:19: fatal error: lzo1x.h: No such file or directory
mtd-utils build fine here after removing *all* the lzo1 related patches and the do_configure_prepend(). Enrico _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
