Hi Enrico,
On 13/01/2011 14:54, Enrico Scholz wrote:
Eric Bénard<[email protected]> writes:
Is there a reason we're perpetuating lzo1 for newer stuff rather than
switching to lzo2?
lzo1 seems necessary :
compr_lzo.c:29:19: fatal error: lzo1x.h: No such file or directory
mtd-utils build fine here after removing *all* the lzo1 related patches
and the do_configure_prepend().
you're right, I should have read more carefully the recipe. Updated path
follows.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
