Hello. On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 11:12, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 10:54:08AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > On Thursday 03 February 2011 10:32:53 Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > > > At that time there was just one recipe depending on libnl2 and that was > > FSO2. > > I think one month ago JaMa has build the first SHR image without libnl(1), > > yes after couple of changes > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/log/?h=org.openembedded.dev&qt=grep&q=libnl > > > until then it was impossible because of some important parts. I'm not sure > > but > > i think the main blocker was bluez4 (Can't check now). > > Yes older bluez4 with nl plugin (which was removed later).
Good, so bluez is of the table. > and: > http://gitorious.org/~jama/angstrom/jama-shr-experimental/commit/70b13d30b335b8fd67116d3bc0834382a77bc319 > 81 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-bmon = "bmon depends on libnl we want libnl2" > 82 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-crda = "crda depends on libnl we want libnl2" No idea about these two. > 83 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-hostap-daemon = "hostap-daemon depends on libnl > we want libnl2" Should be fine to build with CONFIG_LIBNL20 set. Its the same codebase as wpa-supplicant. > 84 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-ibrdtn = "ibrdtn depends on libnl we want libnl2" Maybe I should get a stab at this as I'm the main user of it in OE. :) > 85 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-iw = "iw depends on libnl we want libnl2" Need to check latest version for libnl2 support. Should not be to hard to change it. > 86 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-lowpan-tools = "lowpan-tools depends on libnl we > want libnl2" When I'm going to poke ibrdtn I could take a look here as well. Maybe Dmitry . > 87 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-networkmanager = "networkmanager depends on libnl > we want libnl2" > 88 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-networkmanager-openvpn = "networkmanager-openvpn > depends on libnl we want libnl2" Those two have a pretty big code base and I'm not going to dive into it (again). > 89 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-pstree = "pstree depends on libnl we want libnl2" > 90 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-rfkill = "rfkill depends on libnl we want libnl2" Need to check latest version for libnl2 support. Should not be to hard to change it. > I didn't check if those can be built with libnl2 or if they work properly > with libnl2. As you can see I would be willing to work on some of these. Personally I would aim for getting the recipes over to libnl2 and the kill libnl1 for good in OE. > But be aware that we had enough issues in runtime (build passes ok) caused by > libnl1 built in same sysroot > as libnl2 (that's why I had to blacklist libnl2 in SHR). Thats one more reason to get rid of the old version. :) regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
