Hello. On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:42, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 11:12, Martin Jansa wrote: > > and: > > http://gitorious.org/~jama/angstrom/jama-shr-experimental/commit/70b13d30b335b8fd67116d3bc0834382a77bc319 > > 81 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-bmon = "bmon depends on libnl we want libnl2" > > 82 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-crda = "crda depends on libnl we want libnl2" > > No idea about these two.
crda should be able to work with libnl2 but have issues during do_install() > > > 85 ANGSTROM_BLACKLIST_pn-iw = "iw depends on libnl we want libnl2" > > Need to check latest version for libnl2 support. Should not be to hard to > change > it. Koen spotted that it should be workig with libnl2 and a build test was positive. > > I didn't check if those can be built with libnl2 or if they work properly > > with libnl2. > > As you can see I would be willing to work on some of these. Personally I would > aim for getting the recipes over to libnl2 and the kill libnl1 for good in OE. I have an patch removing it but this may have just to many sideeffects on our metadata. Koens pointed out that we maybe should switch the inc dir from libnl to a "wrong" place and leave libnl2 header at the correct place. Obviously we need to fix most of our recipes for libnl2 before such a step. regards Stefan Schmidt _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
