actual behaviour is to send a report for *each* task runned by bitbake
this is ok for one personnal oestat server but doesn't scale well when
dozen of peoples are running test builders which all send reports to
the OE's infrastructure.

Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <[email protected]>
---
v2: cleaner way to handle the problem as per pb & Jay2 suggestion

 classes/oestats-client.bbclass |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
index 4233d4a..f9ac88f 100644
--- a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
+++ b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
@@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ python oestats_eventhandler () {
                oestats_stop(server, e.data, e.getFailures())
        elif getName(e) == 'TaskStarted':
                bb.data.setVar('OESTATS_STAMP', repr(time.time()), e.data)
-       elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded':
-               oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded')
+       # Temporary disable sending sucess report as this generates to much 
trafic
+       # for the oestat server
+       # elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded':
+       #       oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded')
        elif getName(e) == 'TaskFailed':
                oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Failed')
 }
-- 
1.7.0.4


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to