Hi Khem,
On 18/02/2011 16:35, Khem Raj wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Eric Bénard<[email protected]> wrote:
actual behaviour is to send a report for *each* task runned by bitbake
this is ok for one personnal oestat server but doesn't scale well when
dozen of peoples are running test builders which all send reports to
the OE's infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard<[email protected]>
---
v2: cleaner way to handle the problem as per pb& Jay2 suggestion
classes/oestats-client.bbclass | 6 ++++--
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
index 4233d4a..f9ac88f 100644
--- a/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
+++ b/classes/oestats-client.bbclass
@@ -202,8 +202,10 @@ python oestats_eventhandler () {
oestats_stop(server, e.data, e.getFailures())
elif getName(e) == 'TaskStarted':
bb.data.setVar('OESTATS_STAMP', repr(time.time()), e.data)
- elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded':
- oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded')
+ # Temporary disable sending sucess report as this generates to much
trafic
+ # for the oestat server
+ # elif getName(e) == 'TaskSucceeded':
+ # oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Succeeded')
elif getName(e) == 'TaskFailed':
oestats_task(server, e.data, e.task, 'Failed')
}
will this mean that only failed packages show up on tinderbox ?
exactly. this is a temporary solution and I think this is better than no more
having tinderbox running.
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
