-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21-03-11 03:14, Tom Rini wrote: > On 03/18/2011 12:57 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote: >> 2011/3/17 Richard Purdie<[email protected]>: >>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 19:10 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: >>>> I'm in favor of keeping it, cleaning it up, and improve >>>> the integration with patchwork / git. Throwing it away >>>> would be a very bad sign to all those countless people >>>> who've gone through the pains of actually working with >>>> the bugtracker. >>> >>> The simple question is who is actually going to sort out the mess its >>> in? >>> >>> Who is going to look after it on a continuing basis? >>> >>> If there isn't ownership, nothing is going to change. >> >> Actually I feel the real problem is that: >> - people did not want to get bugs assigned to them (at least that was >> what someone told me in the past) >> - we're lacking a good notion of package or recipe ownership, so even >> if we had someone acting as a bug manager, (s)he would have a hard >> time to find out who to assign an issue to. >> >> and of course it takes discipline to look at regular intervals in the >> bug tracker to see if there are issues that affect the recipes you >> feel responsible for. >> A discipline that few people have and that is also easy to forget if >> there is only very rarely something for you. >> >> So it is more of a process issue. >> (btw this may be something that could be picked up by the TSC). > > The feeling of the TSC thus far has been "where are the active > volunteers to use BTS (bugzilla, whatever)". This far in the thread I > count one.
I count none, actually, since you said 'active volunteers'. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iD8DBQFNhwsIMkyGM64RGpERApNUAJ9V86nRpwP8mTNW9b48FdaTjrTBMgCfXteG GzEx7YQ0Mpuw1Yq1A2ZH6ao= =UJ6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
