Dear Christian,

Am Freitag, den 06.05.2011, 23:18 +0200 schrieb Christian Charreyre:

> Le 05/05/2011 20:58, Paul Menzel a écrit :
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> > I guess that information would be enough.
> >
> > I would think that the following printed by `bitbake mypaint` would be
> > enough. Maybe add the OE repository revision your distribution is based
> > on.
> >
> >          Build Configuration:
> >          BB_VERSION        = "1.12.0"
> >          METADATA_BRANCH   = "73593c5"
> >          METADATA_REVISION = "7f22ddc"
> >          TARGET_ARCH       = "arm"
> >          TARGET_OS         = "linux-gnueabi"
> >          MACHINE           = "beagleboard"
> >          DISTRO            = "angstrom"
> >          DISTRO_VERSION    = "v20110505"
> >          TARGET_FPU        = "hard"
>
> I'm using bitbake 1.8, that's the reason why these informations are not 
> printed when I execute the recipe.

I see.

> Can I safely swap to bitbake 1.12.0 with recipes and classes quite old 
> in my workspace ?
> Thanks for your advise on this point.

I am considering myself not knowledgeable enough to give any advises. I
can only say that I did not experience any problems switching to BitBake
1.12.0. I guess you just have to try. If you experienced any problems
you should open a new thread though.


Thanks,

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to