Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2011, 22:38 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj: As far as I know the `bb` extension should be omitted in the commit summary?
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> Does systemd build for you with this patch and uClibc? > --- > .../systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 > meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch > b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ca10440 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ > +uclibc does not have mkostemp() so we redefine it to use mkstemp() > + > +Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <[email protected]> Is that patch for upstream inclusion? […] Thanks, Paul [1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
