On 07/01/2011 01:47 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 30.06.2011, 22:38 -0700 schrieb Khem Raj:

As far as I know the `bb` extension should be omitted in the commit
summary?

Signed-off-by: Khem Raj<[email protected]>

Does systemd build for you with this patch and uClibc?

ofcourse


---
  .../systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch      |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
  meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_git.bb        |    3 ++-
  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 
meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch

diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch 
b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ca10440
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/systemd/systemd/paper-over-mkostemp.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+uclibc does not have mkostemp() so we redefine it to use mkstemp()
+
+Signed-off-by: Khem Raj<[email protected]>

Is that patch for upstream inclusion?

not yet


[…]


Thanks,

Paul


[1] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Commit_Patch_Message_Guidelines



_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel


_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Reply via email to