Am Dienstag, den 30.08.2011, 12:51 +0200 schrieb Steffen Sledz: > On 25.08.2011 16:09, Steffen Sledz wrote: > > On 25.08.2011 12:59, Steffen Sledz wrote: > >> On 24.08.2011 17:22, Jesse Gilles wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 13:16 -0400, George C. Huntington, III wrote: > >>>> I suspect that the problem is happening earlier, classpath isn't > >>>> building. > >>>> the javac wrapper eats the return code from a java compile. > >>> > >>> If George is right, then the following patch to the javac wrapper script > >>> may fix the issue. It fixes building classpath as well as returns the > >>> error code if all javac attempts fail. > >>> > >>> http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/9521/ > >> > >> In our case this patch helps. > >> > >> If nobody has objections i will commit this patch to oe-dev master and > >> request a pull to 2011.03-maintenance. > > > > It would be still better if we can get some Acks from a java maintainer. > > No NACKs after another week. So i pushed the patch do oe-dev master.
Next time it would be better to resend the patch with a appropriate subject line. Unfortunately the commit message [1] does not conform to our commit policy [2]. Please make sure to check those things next time. I feel uncomfortable to ask new contributors to comply every time but when they look at the commit history they see that the policies are often not cared about. Thanks, Paul [1] http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded/commit/?id=16a8a1e9175035b55d91a141d5302c38d63c16f1 [2] http://openembedded.org/index.php/Category:Policy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
