On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote: > Hi, > > Le 01/09/2011 17:50, Martin Jansa a écrit : > > From: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak<[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<[email protected]> > > --- > > .../0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch | 320 > > ++++++++++++++++++++ > > .../xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb_git.bb | 3 +- > > 2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 > > meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb/0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch > > > why does this driver is inside meta-oe layer instead of the TI layer ?
mostly because N900 also using xf86-video-omapfb is not built by TI :) > btw, as we are starting porting our bsp against meta-oc, is there a document > describing how the layers are splitted ? > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
