Le 02/09/2011 09:16, Martin Jansa a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:01:13PM +0200, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi,
Le 01/09/2011 17:50, Martin Jansa a écrit :
From: Sebastian Krzyszkowiak<[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa<[email protected]>
---
.../0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch | 320
++++++++++++++++++++
.../xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb_git.bb | 3 +-
2 files changed, 322 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video-omapfb/0004-Attempt-to-fix-VRFB.patch
why does this driver is inside meta-oe layer instead of the TI layer ?
mostly because N900 also using xf86-video-omapfb is not built by TI :)
btw, as we are starting porting our bsp against meta-oc, is there a document
describing how the layers are splitted ?
OK, I was thinking that the ti layer was the base layer for products using TI
cpu and not only the layer of products built by TI ;-)
Eric
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
