On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > tl;dr version: get your subject-prefix right > > Hi, > > I've cleaned up patchwork by marking every meta-oe patch as archived, minus > the one Martin just sent. > > This means all the pending patches for meta-oe are listed here: > > http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe > > If your patches are missing, resend them using the method outlined in the > README of the respective meta-openembedded layer. > > I'll include the meta-oe one below, since too many patches still don't comply: > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This layer depends on: > > URI: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core > branch: master > revision: HEAD > > Send pull requests to [email protected] with > '[meta-oe]' in the subject' > > When sending single patches, please use something like 'git send-email -1 > - --to [email protected] --subject-prefix meta-oe' > > You are encouraged to fork the mirror on github > https://github.com/openembedded/meta-oe/ to share your patches, this is > preferred for patch sets consisting of more than one patch. Other services > like gitorious, repo.or.cz or self hosted setups are of course accepted as > well, 'git fetch <remote>' works the same on all of them. We recommend > github because it is free, easy to use, has been proven to be reliable and > has a really good web GUI. > > Main layer maintainer: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> > > - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The most important thing of that is the subject prefix. I only read emails > with a [meta-<foo>] subject prefix on oe-devel nowadays and I look at > http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta- more often than > oe-devel. > > So: Get your subject-prefix right > > And kudos to Andreas, Martin and Otavio for getting their pull requests > right pretty much all the time.
While I appreciate that a blanket "throw it out; if they care they'll resend it" approach is an effective way to deal with the backlog resulting from an absence, I don't appreciate that in addition to the time I spent crafting patches to improve oe-core and submitting them (with the right prefix AFAIK), I am now expected to do so again. Further, the archived discussion of one of my patches included a request for clarification on how to address a licensing issue which was never answered, and which now presumably never will be. This sort of practice discourages people (well, me at least) from contributing to this project. Peter > regards, > > Koen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAk8O7MoACgkQMkyGM64RGpFPUgCfQlCodSyFbuqPSfY6PVL2cPsR > YE8AoIRcwaHFCyvULMbFSH3PeFY8Fjmj > =cU1X > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
