On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Peter Bigot <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> tl;dr version: get your subject-prefix right >> >> Hi, >> >> I've cleaned up patchwork by marking every meta-oe patch as archived, minus >> the one Martin just sent. >> >> This means all the pending patches for meta-oe are listed here: >> >> http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta-oe >> >> If your patches are missing, resend them using the method outlined in the >> README of the respective meta-openembedded layer. >> >> I'll include the meta-oe one below, since too many patches still don't >> comply: >> >> - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> This layer depends on: >> >> URI: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core >> branch: master >> revision: HEAD >> >> Send pull requests to [email protected] with >> '[meta-oe]' in the subject' >> >> When sending single patches, please use something like 'git send-email -1 >> - --to [email protected] --subject-prefix meta-oe' >> >> You are encouraged to fork the mirror on github >> https://github.com/openembedded/meta-oe/ to share your patches, this is >> preferred for patch sets consisting of more than one patch. Other services >> like gitorious, repo.or.cz or self hosted setups are of course accepted as >> well, 'git fetch <remote>' works the same on all of them. We recommend >> github because it is free, easy to use, has been proven to be reliable and >> has a really good web GUI. >> >> Main layer maintainer: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> >> >> - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The most important thing of that is the subject prefix. I only read emails >> with a [meta-<foo>] subject prefix on oe-devel nowadays and I look at >> http://patches.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?q=meta- more often than >> oe-devel. >> >> So: Get your subject-prefix right >> >> And kudos to Andreas, Martin and Otavio for getting their pull requests >> right pretty much all the time. > > While I appreciate that a blanket "throw it out; if they care they'll > resend it" approach is an effective way to deal with the backlog > resulting from an absence, I don't appreciate that in addition to the > time I spent crafting patches to improve oe-core and submitting them > (with the right prefix AFAIK), I am now expected to do so again. > Further, the archived discussion of one of my patches included a > request for clarification on how to address a licensing issue which > was never answered, and which now presumably never will be. > > This sort of practice discourages people (well, me at least) from > contributing to this project.
Perhaps you can just mark them correctly in patchworks again instead of resubmitting? Somewhat easier, you can even keep a list of patch id's and do this automatically via the pwclient. -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
