On 05/02/12 23:06, Khem Raj wrote: > On 05/02/2012 02:35 AM, Martin Ertsås wrote: > > The patches posted seems to be working fine. I at least didn't have > > any problems with them. > > > thanks for trying them out. GCC patch is final but eglibc patch I > still got to improve that its not final version yet.
No problem. Is there also plans for renaming the toolchains created to arm-none-linux-gnueabihf when using hardfloats? Tried doing that, but gcc failed first. Then, after patching up gcc like a madman as well as adding linux-gnueabihf to the package_qa_get_machine_dict dictionary in insane.bbclass, several other projects failed. Among them were openssl and shadow as far as I remember. Probably others as well, but that's where I gave up. Cool, so this will be put upstream with gcc 4.7 and eglibc 2.15? Btw, I was trying your patches with 4.6, not 4.7, as we have not attempted to migrate right now. Will do that soon though, but not right now. - Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
