Hi Nicolas, On 10 April 2013 16:14, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > then, what I could do is a patch serie where patch 1/2 introduces the > INC_PR with "r0", and patch 2/2 fixes gupnp and increments INC_PR to > 'r1'.
Exactly that. > also, is that worthwhile to add the INC_PR in all other recipes in the > gupnp folder ? or just in gupnp recipe for now? Do them all, might as well. Ross _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
