On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > Hi Nicolas, > > On 10 April 2013 16:14, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > > then, what I could do is a patch serie where patch 1/2 introduces the > > INC_PR with "r0", and patch 2/2 fixes gupnp and increments INC_PR to > > 'r1'. > > Exactly that. > > > also, is that worthwhile to add the INC_PR in all other recipes in the > > gupnp folder ? or just in gupnp recipe for now? > > Do them all, might as well.
Is it important now, when PR bumps are not strictly required? There were more dangerous changes without PR bumps included in last months. -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
