On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19/04/2014 1:29 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 19/04/2014 12:27 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello Jonathan, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 13/03/2014 1:01 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This adds the necessary target packages for development with all of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> Qt 5 modules. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Liu <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> | Computing transaction...error: Can't install >>>>>> qtwayland-dev-5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0@cortexa9hf_vfp_neon: no >>>>>> package provides qtwayland = 5.2.1+git0+573d0ee5ba-r0.0 >>>>>> | >>>>>> | Saving cache... >>>>>> | >>>>>> | WARNING: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/run.populate_sdk_image.29400:1 >>>>>> exit 1 from >>>>>> | smart --data-dir=${target_rootfs}/var/lib/smart install -y >>>>>> ${pkgs_to_install} >>>>>> | DEBUG: Python function do_populate_sdk finished >>>>>> | ERROR: Function failed: populate_sdk_image (log file is located at >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /home/otavio/hacking/customer/companytec/yocto/build/tmp/work/wandboard_solo-oel-linux-gnueabi/qsiv-demo-image/1.0-r0/temp/lo >>>>>> >>>>>> Please fix this and test the combinations of enable/disable features. >>>>>> They seem not well tested. >>>>>> >>>>> It looks like qtwayland is not being built properly in your >>>>> configration. >>>>> >>>>> Can you provide configuration and steps to reproduce this failure? >>>>> I have not had any luck in reproducing it. >>>> >>>> The wayland packages cannot be installed if wayland distro feature is >>>> not available. >>>> >>> By default, DISTRO_FEATURES does not contain wayland so I wonder if it >>> makes >>> sense for to add wayland to DISTRO_FEATURES if it is not available. >>> Is there a better method than checking if DISTRO_FEATURES has wayland for >>> qtwayland? >> >> You can check for x11 or wayland in this case. But I think qtwayland >> is useless without wayland in distro features, isn't it? >> > I already do check for wayland in DISTRO_FEATURES before including qtwayland > packages: > > ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'wayland', '${USE_WAYLAND}', '', d)} > > Is this not enough? > > I could perhaps change USE_RUBY, USE_WAYLAND, and USE_X11 to assign with ?= > instead of = so that the packages depending on those can be excluded from > the SDK if desired by setting them to "" in local.conf.
It is. I am rebuilding here and will debug it ... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
